Authors are invited to submit a detailed abstract of 500–750 words for consideration. The abstract should present the central idea of the paper in a clear, scholarly, and engaging manner while remaining accessible to a broad academic audience.

Purpose

The abstract should give reviewers a strong understanding of:

• the topic and its relevance,
• the main argument or research question,
• the key insights, findings, or reflections,
• and the significance of the paper for the conference theme.

Format

Please follow a standard academic structure, while allowing flexibility in style and disciplinary convention. A recommended structure is:

• Title: Clear, concise, and reflective of the paper’s focus.
• Background or Context: Briefly introduce the subject and its significance.
• Purpose or Research Question: State the aim, problem, or question guiding the paper.
• Main Argument, Findings, or Discussion: Summarize the key contribution of the paper.
• Conclusion or Relevance: Explain why the paper matters and how it contributes to the field or conference theme.

Length

• Abstracts should be between 500 and 750 words.
• Submissions that are substantially shorter or longer may be returned for revision.

Review Considerations

Abstracts will be reviewed on the basis of:

• relevance to the conference theme,
• clarity of argument,
• scholarly quality,
• and overall coherence.

Here is a short submission checklist:

• Title is clear and relevant to the theme.
• Abstract is between 500 and 750 words.
• The main idea or argument is stated clearly.
• The topic’s relevance to the conference theme is explained.
• Submission is reviewed for grammar, clarity, and consistency.
• Submission format is a Word document or  PDF file (other formats will not be reviewed)